headermask image

financial pizza header image

Five Myths About Ron Paul

Myth One:  Ron Paul can’t win this election.

Wrong!  Ron Paul can win this election.  Most people haven’t even heard of Ron Paul yet.  Conservatives are not very satisfied by Rudy, Mitt, Fred or the other candidates.  People are not ready for a “Hillary Clinton” presidency and I know they aren’t ready for someone like Barack Obama.  Yes, Ron Paul can win this election.

Myth Two:  Ron Paul is a gun rights supporter so he’ll push for federal laws for gun rights.

Wrong again, Ron Paul is a supporter of gun rights, but  – he doesn’t believe the federal government should have anything to do with gun rights.  The individual states should decide on gun rights issues.   

Myth Three:  The mainstream media is never going to give Ron Paul the air time he needs to win.

Wrong!  Ron Paul is gaining momentum every day.  True, much of that is from daily internet users.  However, the mainstream media are not dummies – eventually they’ll crack under the pressure and be forced to give him his due air time.  After all, not even the mainstream media is dumb enough to miss a story like Ron Paul.

Myth Four:  Ron Paul is pro life so he’ll try to have abortion made illegal.

Wrong!  It’s true that Ron Paul is pro life – his personal views are pro life – but his politics are such that he doesn’t believe the federal government should have anything to do with the topic of abortion – legal or illegal – the states should decide.   It’s the same situation as with gun rights.

Myth Five:  Ron Paul is some kind of a kooky, grouchy old man.

Wrong!  Ron Paul has a political philosophy he believes in – the Constitution of the United States of America.  He has a consistent voting record and hammers out his beliefs.  That’s what it takes to be heard in today’s political climate.  And, he’s not really very old.

E Lawrence Welch

Gun Rights Advocate


Digg!

One Comment

  1. Wrong on two. Ron Paul believes in state’s rights. But the states are delegated powers via the 10th amendment. Since the second is an enumerated right, the stated are expressly forbidden in the constitution from infringing on those rights.

    Alex Kosinski, 9th District Federal Court - Jew who survived holocaust in Romania, where Jews were herded in WW2 (Relocation to Transistria) - Dissented on a case where the government violated our rights and gave a very thoughtful dissenting opinion Quote him in a dissenting opinion (Called the Doomsday provision): “All too many of the other great tragedies of history — Stalin’s atrocities, the killing fields of Cambodia, the Holocaust, to name but a few — were perpetrated by armed troops against unarmed populations. Many could well have been avoided or mitigated, had the perpetrators known their intended victims were equipped with a rifle and twenty bullets apiece, as the Militia Act required here. See Kleinfeld Dissent at 5997-99. If a few hundred Jewish fighters in the Warsaw Ghetto could hold off the Wehrmacht for almost a month with only a handful of weapons, six million Jews armed with rifles could not so easily have been herded into cattle cars. My excellent colleagues have forgotten these bitter lessons of history. The prospect of tyranny may not grab the headlines the way vivid stories of gun crime routinely do. But few saw the Third Reich coming until it was too late. The Second Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances where all other rights have failed — where the government refuses to stand for reelection and silences those who protest; where courts have lost the courage to oppose, or can find no one to enforce their decrees*. However improbable these contingencies may seem today, facing them unprepared is a mistake a free people get to make only once.” — Judge Alex Kozinski, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

    JAMES MADISON (Drafted Virginia Constitution, Member of Continental Congress, Virginia delegate to Constitutional Convention, named “Father of the Constitution”, author of Federalist Papers, author of the Bill of Rights, Congressman from Virginia, Secretary of State, 4th President): “Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation.. (where) ..the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms?.” (Federalist Papers #46) “They [proposed Bill of Rights] relate 1st. to private rights….the great object in view is to limit and qualify the powers of government…” 8 June 1789 (The Papers of James Madison, Hobson amp Rutland, 12:193, 204) “To these (federal troops attempting to impose tyranny) would be opposed a militia amounting to near half a million of citizens with arms in their hands.” (Federalist Papers #46)

    5. Mick Russom on September 15th, 2007 at 5:33 pm

4 Trackbacks

  1. By StumbleUpon » Your page is now on StumbleUpon! on September 16, 2007 at 8:28 am

    Kramer auto Pingback[…] Your page is on StumbleUpon […]

  2. By 5 Myths About Ron Paul « disinter on September 15, 2007 at 10:00 pm

    […] 15th, 2007 by E Lawrence Welch September 15, 2007 […]

  3. By And Another Thing: Ron Paul - 5 Myths Article on September 15, 2007 at 9:54 pm

    Kramer auto Pingback[…] This is an interesting article about Ron Paul. It lists 5 myths about him and goes on to show the facts that make the myth wrong. Take a look at 5 Myths About Ron Paul. […]

  4. By Ron Paul Rocker Report on September 15, 2007 at 9:30 pm

    links from TechnoratiRead original article.5 reads

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*